Is Colt Going to Make the Colt Python Again
Colt's legendary revolver returns to product…better than always
by Bob Campbell
I suppose the Rick Grimes character from The Walking Dead did as much for the six-inch barrel stainless steel Colt Python every bit Muddied Harry's Harry Callahan did for the Smith and Wesson Model 29. However while the show has deteriorated, the Python keeps getting better. Following its 2005 hiatus, Colt reintroduced the new-and-improved Python in 2020, reasonably priced at about $1500.
The cheers of hard-core wheel gun fans have yet to subside nearly two years afterwards.
The price of a new Colt Python .357 Magnum revolver has no begetting on the price of a collector-form Python. The older pistols, if new in the box or lightly used, should go on their value. Overpriced, well-worn Pythons are but shooters non worth the usual asking price.
The new Python is a better revolver. I hear the anguish. I am a Filly fan but an honest 1 as well. I similar the old guns and I appreciate the sense of history and emotional zipper. If y'all desire a Python that left the factory the year you lot were born, that is a great matter. If, like me, you lot are a shooter, and then you volition want a new Python. I don't think the cost is an impediment. Y'all are purchasing ane of the finest—if not the finest—revolvers e'er made. You are getting into this handgun somewhat more than cheaply than a Les Baer or Wilson Combat 1911, simply yous are at the top of the heap when it comes to Magnum revolvers.
The original Python was a strengthened and improved revolver based on the Official Police frame. This is often called the .41 frame. It is larger than the Smith and Wesson K frame only smaller than the Due north frame—a adept balance of strength and handling. The Python features a heavy under-lugged barrel. The sights are fully adjustable. The main advantage of the Python is a beautifully tuned action. The Majestic Blueish or nickel finish was good and so were the highly polished stainless-steel versions. The Python is amid the best-balanced handguns e'er manufactured. I often carry my original iv-inch butt Python. Information technology is fast on the draw and fast on target. At that place is nil like the Python for quick double-action work. The original Python was manufactured primarily with a 4- or a six-inch barrel. Two-and-one-half- and eight-inch barrel versions are less mutual. There are the five-inch butt rarities besides. The new Python is stainless steel and and so far, the six-inch butt seems far more common. I accept withal to examine a four-inch barrel version.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/eba77/eba77dd4dd55075e40e3a031b3d19c280e39d24f" alt=""
Colt's audacious introduction has maintained the outline and profile of the original as well equally the butter smooth action. I feel that CNC machinery and modern precision has immune Filly to manufacture a revolver with a lighter trigger action than the original while maintaining reliable ignition. This is a pull a fast one on that has eluded many custom revolver smiths.
A business organization with the original revolver was a lockup that transferred recoil energy to the activeness. This showed upwardly in loftier-round-count revolvers. Colt'south tight lockup suffered more than than other revolvers but maintained exceptional accuracy. The new action is smoother merely more rugged. The frame is beefed upwards also. There is nothing wrong with the Ruger GP100 revolver and I believe Filly took a hard wait at the GP100—some other .41 frame revolver—in designing the new Python to be all it tin can be.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/96f08/96f082e9e328a845622c8e867734aba81a2953fb" alt=""
The rear sight is a more robust design than the original and the front sight is removeable. The barrel features a well-done recessed crown. The handle geometry is slightly inverse. I find this an improvement that makes for a superior firing angle. I also like the new Python grips. They offer good mitt fit in both double-activeness and unmarried-action burn. I prefer the classy, checkered design from Deer Hollow but the new Python blueprint is certainly useful. The new grips feature several positioning pins and are very tight from the factory.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d0e94/d0e94330c4beec374e2e87fad78c72e98a69ecf2" alt=""
The updated half dozen-inch Python passes muster on every point of examination. The existent test is firing. I had some business concern the action may be besides light to scissure harder primers, but these fears proved unfounded. The revolver has been completely reliable. I take fired a skilful mix of .38 and .357 Magnum loads. I savor handloading and the Python compliments a careful handloader.
There have been folks who say the new Python locked up on them. The Colt handles differently than a Smith and Wesson. The Smith has a render jump that presses the trigger back in place. The Colt is powered simply by the V spring. If you practice non allow the Colt trigger to fully render, it will, indeed, lock up. The cure is to simply release the trigger all the mode forward after firing. The technique is uncomplicated. Printing the trigger smoothly to the rear. Every bit the revolver fires, allow the trigger to fully reset during recoil. As you re-align the sights, begin the trigger press over again.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1024c/1024c7d920cad08f72b0130a58ac5f44480dcd55" alt=""
In double-action fire, there were no surprises. A vi-inch barrel .357 Magnum revolver hangs on the target and doesn't recoil very much. Keep up a rhythm with the trigger and you will destroy the target's X ring. This is why the Python ruled PPC matches equally an out-of-the-box competitor. The .38 Special is a well-balanced and authentic cartridge. Miserly with gun powder and more powerful than most allow it credit, the .38 Special is a fine all-around target, defense, and outdoors cartridge.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3a70d/3a70dab6f75e433a00d33e765ab06479e192b1b9" alt=""
The six-inch barrel .357 Magnum is sometimes chosen a rifle on the hip. I tested the new six-inch barrel Python confronting a vintage four-inch barrel Python. The new gun is more accurate, just a six-inch barrel Python should exist. Velocity with the longer barrel is as much as 180 fps greater than the four-inch barrel, but not with every load. The Black Hills Ammunition 158 grain JHP gained just ten anxiety per second in the longer barrel. There are exceptions, but as a rule, the longer barrel generates greater velocity and a longer sight radius makes for greater accuracy potential.
I like the new Python. Love information technology or not, or resent the changes, the Colt Python is at present available for shooters wishing to own a superior revolver.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/561c3/561c3c065e61e3ea4e34e5d753776e8302ddd612" alt=""
Accuracy Testing
This examination employed v-shot groups at 25 yards.
.38 Special
- Buffalo Bore Outdoorsman 158 grain SWCHP; 1129 fps; ane.9 in
- Blackness Hills Armament 158 grain cowboy; 802 fps; 2.3 in
- 196 grain Matt'due south Bullets/WW231/Titegroup; 690 fps; 2.0 in
.357 Magnum
- Fiocchi 158 grain XTP; 1162 fps; 1.0 in
- Blackness Hills Armament 158 grain JHP; 1272 fps; 1.0
- Black Hills Ammunition 125 grain JHP; 1503 fps; 1.2 in
- Winchester 158 grain JHP; 1379 fps; 1.25 in
- Buffalo Bore 180 grain JHP; 1380 fps; 1.25 in
- Winchester 145 grain Silvertip; 1316 fps; ane.4 in
- Black Hills Armament 127 grain Honey Badger; 1478 fps; 1.5 in
Handloads
- 125 grain Hornady XTP/W296; 1550 fps; 1.0 in
- 180 grain Hornady XTP/H110; 1210 fps; 1.0 in
- 158 grain Hornady XTP/H110; 1308 fps; 1.2 in
- 173 grain Matts Bullets SWC/H110; 1160 fps; 1.25 in
- 125 grain Hornady XTP/H110 MAX, 1638 fps; 1.65 in
1977 Python, four-inch barrel
- Fiocchi 158 grain JHP; 1090 fps; i.6 in
- Black Hills Ammunition 127 grain Honey Badger; 1411 fps; one.vii in
- Blackness Hills Ammunition 125 grain JHP; 1390 fps; 1.9 in
Source: https://shoot-on.com/field-test-the-new-colt-python/
0 Response to "Is Colt Going to Make the Colt Python Again"
Postar um comentário